Back
HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK MIRI
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Appellant
Versus
AFIZA SULIHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal refers to a decision on money laundering charges. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. evidence presented against the respondent includes bank transactions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. knowledge of illegal activity's proceeds must be established. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. appellant argues the knowledge can be inferred. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. the court recommends that the respondent must defend against suffices of charges. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge ("SCJ") who acquitted and discharged the Respondent at the end of the prosecution case.
[2] There were 60 cases in the Sessions Court and each one is given a case number from MYY-62K-1/6-2014 until MYY-62K-60/6-2014. Each case contains 3 charges. Altogether there were 180 charges preferred against the Respondent jointly tried under s 4(1), (a) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001 ("AMLATFA")
[3] The details of these 180 charges can be found at pg 3 - 182 of the Appeal Record Vol I. The offence committed by the Respondent under the AMLATFA is reflected in the relevant charge with
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
