SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 222

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
HO KAI BUN – Appellant
Versus
SALINA LEE MAY LEE – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Aliza Abdul Samad ,Respondent Advocate: Lim Yeeu Ren

Table of Content
1. the appeal addresses the validity of a claim for loan repayment. (Para 1 , 14)
2. the cause of action relates to the timing of loan disbursement versus demand. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
3. the without prejudice rule applies to negotiations aimed at dispute resolution. (Para 23 , 26)
SM Komathy Suppiah J:

The Appeal

[1] This is an appeal by the defendant against the decision of the learned sessions judge who on 31 December 2018 allowed the plaintiff's application for summary judgment with costs of RM4,000.00. The plaintiff's claim was for the repayment of a loan allegedly given in 2004 for Singapore Dollars $85,000.00 and a further loan in 2008 for RM30,000.00.

[2] This appeal concerns the scope of the without prejudice rule.

Salient Facts

[3] The facts relevant to this appeal are set out in the written submissions of the parties and I gratefully adopt them here. The plaintiff and the defendant were married in 2002.

[4] In 2017, the marriage broken down. Following that, the defendant and plaintiff appointed their respective solicitors to negotiate and finalise the terms of settlement towards the filing of a divorce petition and a global settlement of all other claims

[5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top