SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 1507

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MOHD ALIF ANAS MD NOOR & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Hanif Khatri,Aidil Khalid ,Respondent Advocate: Alison Goh Poi Sze

JUDGMENT

Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali J:

Introduction

[1] These are the applications filed by the first and second defendants (enclosure 182), the sixth and seventh defendants (enclosure 185) and the thirteenth defendant (enclosure 187), supported by all the other defendants (apart from the twelfth defendant which had withdrawn and only held a watching brief) for the suit filed by the plaintiffs to be disposed by way of the determination of questions of law pursuant to O 14A r 1 or O 33 r 2 of the Rules of 2012 ("the RC 2012").

[2] At the end of the hearing of the applications which was conducted via Zoom video technology, I allowed the applications and highlighted the main grounds for my decision. This judgment contains the full reasons for the same.

Key Background Facts

[3] The first plaintiff is the President of Gabungan Pelajar Melayu Semenanjung (GPMS) and is suing on its behalf, whilst the second plaintiff is the Secretary of Majlis Pembangunan Pendidikan Islam Malaysia (MAPPIM) and is suing on its behalf. The third plaintiff is a representative of Gabungan Persatuan Penulis Nasional Malaysia (GAPENA).

[4] The plaintiffs filed a writ action primarily against the Minister of Education a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top