SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 876

HIGH COURT MALAYA MELAKA
CHOO YEOH JEE & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PESURUHJAYA SUKAN – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application seeking to quash revocation of sports body registration. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 24)
2. grounds for judicial review regarding procedural impropriety and authority. (Para 20 , 21 , 40)
Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera J:

The Application

[1] This is an application by the applicants for judicial review, seeking inter alia, the following reliefs:-

(i) an order of certiorari to quash the decision of the respondent dated 11 March 2015 revoking the registration of Persatuan Menembak Melaka ("PMM") as a sports body under the Sports Development Act 1997 ("Act 576");

(ii) a declaration that the aforesaid order of the respondent dated 11 March 2015 is null, ultra vires and void and has no effect;

(iii) an order for stay of the respondent's aforesaid decision pending disposal of this application;

(iv) cost; and

(v) other consequential reliefs deemed appropriate by the court.

[2]Ex parte leave was granted and thereafter the applicants filed the substantive application for judicial review. After hearing parties, I dismissed the substantive application for the following reasons

The Facts

[3] The first to fourth applicants are the office-bearers of PMM, whilst the fifth applicant is PMM's Ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top