LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA vs MOHD ABDUL KARIM ABDULLAH & ORS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 1287

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA – Appellant
Versus
MOHD ABDUL KARIM ABDULLAH & ORS – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Adilah Abdul Wahid ,Respondent Advocate: Amira Nur Nadia Azhar

Table of Content
1. application for summary judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. background facts of the case. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. law on summary judgment applications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. defendants' mala fide claims. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
5. directors' liability for unpaid epf. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
6. statutory obligations of directors. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)
7. court's findings and justification for summary judgment. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)
8. final judgment and conclusion. (Para 57 , 58 , 59)

Rozi Bainon JC:

Introduction

[1] The interlocutory application filed by the Plaintiff before me is for a summary judgment under O 14 Rules of Court 2012 for the Defendants to be held liable to pay the outstanding Employees Provident Fund contributions to the Plaintiff.

[2] On 31 May 2023, I allowed the Plaintiff's application with costs. The Defendants are aggrieved and appeal to the Court of Appeal.

[3] This judgment contains the reasons for my decision.

The Background Facts

[4] The Plaintiff instituted a suit against all the 4 Defendants for the o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 1287

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAMLEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA – AppellantVersusMOHD ABDUL KARIM ABDULLAH & ORS – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA – Appellant
Versus
MOHD ABDUL KARIM ABDULLAH & ORS – Respondent