Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
VENGADASALAM MUNUSAMY & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
SANKARAN KURTY ANANDHAN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application to amend notice of appeal is under consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. application by appellants to amend notice. (Para 3) |
| 3. the power of the court to allow amendments must serve justice. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. respondent's objections against validity of the appeal presented. (Para 6) |
| 5. the court's evaluation of the necessity of naming parties. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
[1] This is an application by the Appellants/ Plaintiffs pursuant to O 20 r 8 Rules of 2012 (" ROC 2012") dated 14 August 2018 (encl 5) to amend the Notice of Appeal.
[2] The cause papers for this application are as follows:
(a) The Appellant/ Plaintiffs Notice of Application dated (Ex-Parte) dated 14 August 2018;
(b) The Appellants/ Plaintiffs Affidavit in Support affirmed by Vengadasalam a/l Munusamy and Muniamah a/p Renu on 14 August 2018; and
(c) The Third Respondent/ Defendants Affidavit in Reply affirmed by P. Umma Devi a/p Periasamy on 29 August.
The Essential Fact
[3] Having read all the Affidavits filed by the respective, I have concluded the fact as below:
(a) Appellant's/Plaintiffs has filed Writ and Statement of Claim in Session Court Klang No B53KJ-17-12- 2016 against the Defendants / First and S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
