IOI CORPORATION BERHAD vs GEMENCHEH GRANITE SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 MarsdenLR 1604

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
IOI CORPORATION BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
GEMENCHEH GRANITE SDN BHD – Respondent

Table of Content
1. introduction and claims of trespass and injunction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. plaintiff's arguments relating to land viability and damage. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. defendant's rebuttal and evidence challenges. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
4. court's findings and rationale regarding claims. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
5. conclusion and overall ruling by the court. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 46 , 47 , 48)

Rozana Ali Yusoff JC:

A. Introduction

[1] The Plaintiff claims are as follows:-

[a] An Order for injunction to restraint the Defendant from enroaching the Plaintiff's land known as Geran 36738 Lot 10607 and Geran 3088 Lot 2942 Mukim Gemencheh, Daerah Tampin, Negeri Sembilan (the said Land).

[b] An Order for injunction to restraint the Defendant from continuing any activities, quarry works and /or any action that cause or would cause blockage to the water flow from the stream which had resulted flooding to the said Land.

[c] The Defendant to pay the Plaintiff RM682,930.00 for loss of use of the said Land.

[d] The Defendant to pay the Plaintiff RM10,000.00 for restoration works to prevent flood and siltation in the said Land and als

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 MarsdenLR 1604

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAMIOI CORPORATION BERHAD – AppellantVersusGEMENCHEH GRANITE SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
IOI CORPORATION BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
GEMENCHEH GRANITE SDN BHD – Respondent