SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1888

HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
SUBRAMANIAM GOPAL – Appellant
Versus
G SANTHIRASEGARAM GOPAL & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's claims regarding property sales. (Para 1 , 2)
2. issues arising from proceedings against a deceased defendant. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
3. claims about representation and authority in the proceedings. (Para 10 , 11 , 19)
4. court's authority to hear legal issues at any stage. (Para 21 , 22)
5. nullity of actions against deceased's estate. (Para 44 , 45)
Kamaludin Md Said JC:

Background

[1] In this case the Plaintiff is seeking for:-

i) an order that Property held under Geran H.S (D) 11993 PT No. 990, Mukim Ampang, Daerah Kuala Lumpur at No. 12, Jalan Pertiwi, Taman Maluri, Cheras, 55100, Kuala Lumpur be sold through a private agreement or a public auction;

ii) an order that Property held Geran PM 110 Lot 2751, Mukim Ampang, Daerah Kuala Lumpur at No. 116, Lorong 6, Kg. Pandan, 55100, Kuala Lumpur be sold through a private agreement or a public auction;

iii) avaluer to be appointed to prepare the valuation of Property 1 and Property 2;

iv) that the Plaintiff be given an opportunity to purchase Property 1 and 2;

v) 3rd, 4th and 5th Defendant to be ordered to give full and frank statement of rentals collected by them on 1st and 2nd Property;

[2] At the outset, the Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top