HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
GEORGE PATHMANATHAN MICHAEL GANDHI NATHAN – Appellant
Versus
PORTCULLIS INTERNATIONAL LTD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for injunction to prevent fund dissipation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. justification for mareva injunctions. (Para 3) |
| 3. background on shareholding and consent order. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. criteria for granting mareva injunction laid out. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court finds real risk of asset dissipation based on conduct. (Para 12) |
[1] The 1st and 2nd Respondents' application is for the following orders:-
(i) an order restraining the Petitioner, Portcullis Trustnet (Labuan) Ltd and the 3rd Respondent, whether by themselves or through their directors, officers, nominees or agents whosoever, from uplifting, transferring, disposing, removing and/or dissipating the monies USD821,034.09 (as per the Statement of Account dated 8 July 2016) ("the monies") held in a time deposit by Portcullis Trustnet (Labuan) Ltd pursuant to a Consent Order dated 8 September 2015;
(ii) an order restraining the Petitioner, Portcullis Trustnet (Labuan) Ltd and the 3rd Respondent, whether by themselves or through their directors, officers, nominees or agents whosoever, from entering into any transactions, arrangement or agreement involving the monies;
(iii) an order restraining the Petitioner,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.