SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 MarsdenLR 3540

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
M WEALTH CORRIDOR SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BJ PROPERTIES SDN BHD & ORS (ENCL 31 & 32) – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Conrad Young,PL Leong ,Respondent Advocate: B Thangaraj,Nashilla

JUDGMENT

(Enclosures No 31 & 32)

Johan Lee Kien How JC:

Introduction

[1] On or about 30 July 2015 a sale and purchase agreement ("SPA") was entered into between the plaintiff and the first defendant to purchase the property known as Pajakan Negeri PN 51541, Lot No 11979, Mukim Ampang, Daerah Kuala Lumpur, Negeri Wilayah Persekutuan ("Ampang land"). The purchase price was RM281,718,700 of which:

(i) a deposit of RM28,171,870 ("deposit") was payable upon execution of the SPA; and

(ii) the balance RM253,546,830 ("balance purchase price") was payable within 90 days from the date the SPA becomes unconditional on 20 December 2015 ("completion date"), with an extension of 30 days subject to the payment of interest on 19 January 2016 ("extended completion date").

The second defendant is said to be a person with authority and control over the first defendant. The third defendant is an established "political and corporate personality". He was also a former board member and director of the plaintiff. The fourth defendant is a principal from the legal firm Chan Tse Yuen & Co who was the former legal counsel for the plaintiff.

[2] According to cl 3.1 of the SPA, the deposit was to be paid to the first


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top