FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
CHEN BOON KWEE – Appellant
Versus
BERJAYA SOMPO INSURANCE BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal centers on issues (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. respondent's liability arguments (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's discussion on liability (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. court's reasoning on recovery action (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 74) |
| 5. appeal allowed (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73) |
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] This appeal centres on the following main issues, namely:
(i) whether in the circumstances of this case, s 91(1)(b)(bb) of the Road Transport Act 1987 (" RTA ") operated to exclude the respondent's statutory liability under s 96(1) , such that it did not have to pay the appellant the benefit of a judgment he had obtained against the policy-holder at the Sessions Court ;
(ii) whether s 96(1) RTA permits the beneficiary of a judgment against an insured person to directly enforce the same against an insurer, in this case the respondent, without the need for a further judgment directly
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.