SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2570

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
KAMUJA HARTAMAS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details of the plaintiff's claim and the appeal process. (Para 1 , 2)

[1] The Plaintiff, Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad claimed against the First Defendant for the recovery of monies which was due and payable under the financing facilities granted by the Plaintiff. The Second and Third Defendants were sued as guarantors. After a full trial and before the learned High Court Judge proceeded to deliver her decision, the First Defendant paid the amount claimed by the Plaintiff. The learned High Court Judge then proceeded to decide only on the counterclaim of the First Defendant which Her Ladyship had dismissed. This appeal by the First Defendant emanates from the dismissal of the counterclaim.

[2] We have heard the appeal and had allowed the appeal of the First Defendant. We ordered for damages to be assessed by the Registrar at the High Court. We set out below our reasons for our decision.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top