COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
RANDHIR SINGH BHAJNIK SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SUNILDAVE SINGH PARMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the relevance and challenges surrounding statutory declarations as evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. the interpretation of evidential burdens and statutory requirements in financial disputes. (Para 3 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
[2] In the instant case, the learned counsel for the respondent had relied on the case of Wong Kian Wah v. Ng Kien Boon , [2018] 7 AMR 621 , the coram consisting of Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JCA, Abdul Rahman Sebli JCA and Mary Lim Thiam Suan JCA. The facts of Wong Kian Wah case is different. In Wong Kian Wah case, the admission was in the agreed facts. There was no challenge to that admission. In the instant case, the statutory declaration and its purpose had been a point of contention in the entire trial.
[3] The said statutory declaration and its terms as well as the amount will on the face of record, to any reasonable tribunal will appear that there must
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.