SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 1950

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
STATE GOVERNMENT OF NEGERI SEMBILAN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMAD JUZAILI MOHD KHAMIS & ORS – Respondent


Raus Sharif PCA:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal declaring s 66 of the Syariah Criminal (Negeri Sembilan) Enactment 1992 to be invalid as being unconstitutional due to inconsistency with arts 5(1), 8(1), (2), 9(2) and 10(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution .

[2] The 1st appellant is the State Government of Negeri Sembilan. The 2nd appellant is the Islamic Affairs Department of Negeri Sembilan, which is a department of the 1st appellant responsible for Islamic affairs within the State of Negeri Sembilan. The 3rd appellant is the Director of the 2nd appellant.

[3] The 4th appellant is the Chief Religious Enforcement Officer of Negeri Sembilan, who is appointed pursuant to s 79 of the Administration of the Religion of Islam (Negeri Sembilan) Enactment 2003. Amongst his duties is the carrying out of investigations under any written law in Negeri Sembilan prescribing offences against the precepts of the religion of Islam.

[4] The 5th appellant is the Chief Syarie Prosecutor of Negeri Sembilan who is appointed pursuant to s 78(1) of the Administration of the Religion of Islam (Negeri Sembilan) Enactment 2003. The 5th appellant has the power exercis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top