SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 2485

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BALAKRISHNAN KALIAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
SHAMEENA NATHESAN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Amarjeet Singh,Avtar Singh ,Respondent Advocate: Jennifer Thomas

[1] This appeal arose from the decision of the High Court in Shah Alam in respect of a petition for divorce filed by the respondent ("wife") against the appellant ("husband") which was granted by the learned Judicial Commissioner on 29 September 2017 wherein the marriage was dissolved and the wife was given the sole right over their matrimonial home located at No 25, Jalan SS 4/10, 47301, Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan. That was not all. The husband was also restrained from entering or staying at the said house and to come into close contact with the wife on account of physical and mental abuse suffered by her at his hands. However, the aggrieved husband's appeal which we heard and dismissed on 25 April 2018 was not the only legal proceeding filed by the wife. There was an earlier divorce petition which she filed in 2013 for the same prayers to, inter alia, dissolve the marriage and for the sole right over the matrimonial home but this was dismissed by the High Court on 12 January 2015. On 29 July 2015, her appeal to this Court was allowed in part in that the order in respect of the matrimonial home was set aside. On 28 September 2015, the Marriage Tribunal issued a certificat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top