GOPAL SRI RAM, MOHD GHAZALI YUSOFF, ZULKEFLI MAKINUDIN
AZIZI AMRAN – Appellant
Versus
HIZZAM CHE HASSAN – Respondent
Zulkefli Makinudin JCA:
[1] This is an appeal by the plaintiff against the decision of the learned judge of the High Court at Penang who on an appeal by the plaintiff in respect of quantum only had affirmed the award of damages made by the learned judge of the Sessions Court and dismissed the plaintiff's appeal. At the Sessions Court the defendant had been found totally liable for the accident.
[2] Mr. Brijnandan Singh Bhar, learned counsel for the plaintiff before the High Court on appeal and again before us had argued on two main grounds as follows:
(a) that the award for pain and suffering amounting to RM28,000 was manifestly low.
(b) that there should have been an award for loss of earning capacity.
Pain And Suffering
[3] In the first medical report produced for the plaintiff it is stated that as of the date of accident that is 7 April 1996, the plaintiff was in hospital for 18 days. The injuries were as follows:
(1) Closed supracondylar fracture of left femur with comminution;
(2) Closed fracture mid-shaft of left tibia;
(3) Old fracture of upper 1/3 left tibia.
Management:
(1) Plating of left femur with bone grafting done under spinal anesthesia after 16 days of admi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.