Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
KANG HAI HOLDINGS SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
LEE LAI BAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the appeal focused on turquand's rule and parties' identities. (Para 1 , 2 , 6) |
| 2. facts surrounding unauthorized transactions involving land. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. material facts reveal khh and khr's ownership and siva's actions. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court assesses the applicability of the rule in turquand regarding lee. (Para 9 , 13) |
| 5. implications of turquand's rule for outsiders. (Para 10 , 16) |
| 6. authority issues on representation in company dealings. (Para 12 , 14 , 22 , 24) |
| 7. court observation on constructive notice and responsibility of parties. (Para 15 , 17) |
| 8. final ruling highlights responsibilities and misrepresentation of authority. (Para 18 , 19 , 26) |
| 9. final ruling on the appeal outcome. (Para 27) |
[1] We heard this appeal and the arguments presented by the appellants and the respondents on 27 September 2017 and we reserved the matter to a date to be fixed. We now deliver our judgment on the same to support the orders the court makes today.
[2] This appeal touches on the question of the Rule in Turquand as it is commonly referred to in Company Law. As it is essentially a fact driven appeal, before dealing with the specific questions posed, the ma
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
