SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 94

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MENTARI SEKITAR SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
HERITAGE PROPERTY SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal context and core issues regarding sale agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding breach of contract and counterclaims. (Para 4 , 6 , 9)
3. court’s findings on the validity of contract termination. (Para 7 , 10 , 20 , 21)
4. rules of parol evidence and its exclusion. (Para 14 , 15 , 19)
Idrus Harun JCA:

Introduction

[1] This appeal is related to Civil Appeal No: W-02(NCVC)(W)-1846-10- 2014 in which Mentari Sekitar Sdn Bhd is also the appellant. However, the respondents are two different companies which are related. At the outset, it must be observed that both appeals involve similar facts and issues with the appellant and the respondents seeking the same relief in their respective claim and counterclaim save differences such as the respective purchase price and the description of the subject land involved. That being the case, the learned counsel for both parties had agreed to proceed with the present appeal only and that the decision in this appeal would bind the other appeal. The appeal is directed against the decision of the learned trial judge in allowing the respondent's claim against the appellant. The respondent has also filed a cross appeal seeki

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top