TANG LOON PAU & ORS vs MOHD SALIHIN KOTNI & ANOR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 2002

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TANG LOON PAU & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MOHD SALIHIN KOTNI & ANOR – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:C M Maran,Khairul Aiman Kamar Rozaman ,Respondent Advocate:

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6)
2. overview of the appeal process. (Para 7 , 8)
3. evidence regarding the alleged accident. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. court's initial findings on liability. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. high court's analysis of the scj's findings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. arguments regarding insurer's liability. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
7. key legal questions framed for determination. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
8. discussion on insurer's rights and obligations. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
9. conclusion on insurer's liability based on evidence. (Para 35 , 36 , 37)
10. historical context and legal precedents. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
11. final ruling and affirmation of the high court's decision. (Para 43 , 44 , 45)
12. outcome of the appeal. (Para 46)

S Nantha Balan JCA:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by Tang Loon Pau (1st Plaintiff - "P1") and all the dependants of the late Mdm Tan Kiok Sit ("the Deceased") (collectively, "the Plaintiffs") against the decision of the learned Judge of the High Court ("the Judge") dated 13 August 2020 in allowing the appeal by Pacific & Orient Insurance Co Berhad (No. Syarikat: 12557-W) (2n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 2002

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYATANG LOON PAU & ORS – AppellantVersusMOHD SALIHIN KOTNI & ANOR – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TANG LOON PAU & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MOHD SALIHIN KOTNI & ANOR – Respondent