FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
S & M JEWELLERY TRADING SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
FUI LIAN-KWONG HING SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the threshold issue concerns the validity of a lease and resultant rights due to non-registration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the court deliberated on definitions surrounding tenancy types while preserving equitable rights. (Para 8 , 9) |
[1] The sole question upon which leave was granted to appeal against the order of the Court of Appeal in respect of the matter decided by the High Court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction reads:
"If a lease or sub-lease (exceeding three years) is rendered void by reason of want of registration under the provisions of the National Land Code , does the lease or sub-lease become:
(i) A tenancy at will and if so for what period? or
(ii) An equitable sub-lease and if so, for what period?"
[2] By a sub-lease and Guarantee Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the agreement) dated 1 November 2006, the respondent, as the registered lessee, sub-leased certain floors of a seven storey building known as Wisma Fui Chiu and erected on land held under Geran 42414, Lot 130, Bandar Kuala Lumpur (hereinafter referred to as the demised premises) to the 1st appellant for a term of 25 years, that is, from 1 May 2006 to 16 October 2031,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.