SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 1234

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SINARLIM SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
WAJA DESTINASI (M) SDN BHD – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ramly Ali JCA:

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned judge of the Kuala Lumpur High Court (KL - D8) dated 17 January 2008 in setting aside the winding - up order earlier made by the Ipoh High Court on 21 June 2007 vide the Ipoh High Court Companies (Winding - Up) Petition No: 28 - 1 - 2007 (Ipoh Winding - Up) against the respondent.

Factual Background

[2] The appellant is a sub - contractor for the respondent who was the main contractor for the Flood Mitigation Works carried out for the benefit of the Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia, at Kampung Gajah, Teluk Intan, Perak Darul Ridzuan.

[3] It is not in dispute that the respondent owed the appellant a sum of RM479,825. 52. The appellant then issued a statutory notice pursuant to s 218(1)(e) of the Companies Act 1965 and served it on the respondent on 5 October 2006. The respondent did not pay the debt even after expiry of the 21 days.

[4] On 5 January 2007, the appellant filed a winding up Petition No: 28 - 1 - 2007 at the Ipoh High Court and the petition was fixed for hearing on 21 June 2007. The said petition was duly served on the respondent on 23 February 2007. The Ipoh High Court then issued

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top