HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MOHAMMAD NAJIB TUN HAJI ABDUL RAZAK – Appellant
Versus
THOMAS THOMAS @ MOHAN K THOMAS & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial claims filed and procedural context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. legal basis for striking claims against public officials. (Para 20 , 30 , 40) |
| 3. discretion and the immunity of public prosecutors. (Para 50 , 60) |
| 4. final ruling on claim sustainability and court process. (Para 90 , 95) |
A. Introduction
[1] The Plaintiff had filed a civil claim against Thomas Thomas also known as Tommy Thomas, formally appointed as the Attorney General/ Public Prosecutor ("AG/PP") of Malaysia as the First Defendant and the Government of Malaysia as the Second Defendant. However, the claim against the Government of Malaysia was eventually dropped with Tommy Thomas remained as the sole Defendant.
[2] According to the Plaintiff, this suit is premised solely on the conducts and actions of the Defendant/Tommy Thomas which essentially alleged that Tommy Thomas as the former AG/PP did not exercise his power for the authorized purpose but for his own agenda. He had allegedly interfered in the investigation and attempted to prejudice and suppress the Plaintiff. That conducts/actions of Tommy Thomas have given rise to the following causes of action upon which the Plaintiff had fil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.