SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 MarsdenLR 639

MOHD.AZMI
MAMAT DAUD – Appellant
Versus
THE GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the applicants - G. Sri Ram; M/s. Sri Ram, Zulkifly & Kumar
For the respondent - T. Selventhiranathan; SFC

JUDGMENT

Mohd. Azmi SCJ:

When I granted the applicants leave under Article 4(4) of the Federal Constitution, I indicated that I would give my reasons for allowing the notice of motion. I now proceed to do so.

The issue in this case is whether the penal offences introduced by the new s. 298A of the Penal Code by the Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Act 1983 (Act A549) is ultra vires Article 74(1) as being in excess of the legislative power of Parliament. Inter alia, the new section makes it a penal offence for any person to cause disharmony, disunity or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will, on grounds of religion, between persons or groups of persons professing the same or different religions. The offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, and if committed in the proximity of any place of worship or in any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremony the imprisonment term may extend to five years. It is common ground that the word "religion" in the new section is intended by Parliament to cover all religions including Islam. Mr. Sri Ram, Counsel for the applicants submits that by virtue of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top