SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 MarsdenLR 1220

CHAO HICK TIN
RE MECHANISED CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates:
DA Mitchell for the petitioning creditor.
Kelvin Lim for the company.
Solicitors: Donaldson & Burkinshaw; Tan, Lee & Choo.

Chao Hick Tin JC

These winding-up proceedings were first initiated by Haller (Far East) Pte Ltd on 22 November 1986 on the ground that the debtor company, Mechanised Construction Pte Ltd, owed Haller a sum of $64,297.96. The petition of Haller was based on neglect by the company to pay up the sum demanded within three weeks of the issue of the statutory notice. On 17 November 1987, by an order of court, Haller was given leave to withdraw its petition and in its place, Boustead Services Pte Ltd ('Boustead') was granted leave to be substituted as the petitioning creditor. The substituted petition was filed on 22 December 1987. The ground upon which the substituted petitioner sought to rely to wind up the company was that the latter neglected to pay or satisfy a statutory notice of demand dated 20 January 1987 for a sum of $141,036.79.

The sum of $141,036.79 was alleged to be due from the company to Boustead under a sale contract dated 30 June 1985 whereby Boustead agreed to supply, fabricate and install structural steelworks of an estimated total weight of 201 metric tonnes at the rate of $1,490 per tonne, making an estimated total of $299,490. These materials and services were requi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top