ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD vs MENTERI SUMBER MANUSIA & ORS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 MarsdenLR 2052

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI SUMBER MANUSIA & ORS – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Sivabalah Nadarajah,Reena Enbasegaram ,Respondent Advocate: Ruzaimah Mohd Ridzuan,Shazreen Nadia Zulkipli

Table of Content
1. conclusion on the dismissal of the appellant's appeal. (Para 1)
2. promotion leading to change in union representation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. the promotion and employee classification of clerical staff. (Para 5)
4. dispute over union representation and complaints to minister. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. minister's decision based on dgir findings. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. challenge to the judicial review process and evidence requirements. (Para 14 , 30)
7. arguments against minister's decision and need for evidence. (Para 15 , 28 , 29)
8. judicial review principles regarding executive discretion. (Para 18 , 20 , 23)
9. court's findings on compliance with the law. (Para 21 , 22 , 24)
10. affidavit transparency and decision-making compliance. (Para 25 , 27)

[1] Having heard arguments by both sides, we dismissed the appellant's appeal with costs. We found no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court dismissing the appellant's application for judicial review to quash the decision of the 1st respondent ("the Minister"). Our decision was unanimous and these are our grounds for dismissing the appeal.

[2] The salient facts are as follows. Sometime in 2012, the appellant, a license

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2018 MarsdenLR 2052

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD – AppellantVersusMENTERI SUMBER MANUSIA & ORS – Respondent

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI SUMBER MANUSIA & ORS – Respondent