SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 MarsdenLR 501

INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
LEO BURNETT ADVERTISING SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TEH BEE BEE – Respondent


AWARD

The claimant joined the company as an Account & Administration Assistant sometime in November 1996 at a starting salary of RM1,900 per month. By letter dated 20 October 2000, the company terminated the claimant's services. The dispute is therefore over the summary dismissal of the claimant by the company.

The claimant claims that on 8 August 2000, the company informed her that no salary increment for her for the review year. The company also issued a new job description to the claimant incorporating extra and new tasks. On 22 August 2000, the company issued a Performance Appraisal to the claimant, stating that the claimant has failed to meet the requirements in the claimant's new job. The claimant avers that on 29 September 2000 the company e-mailed a show cause letter to the claimant. The claimant says she replied to the company's letter denying all the allegations on 29 September 2000 through e-mail.

It is her claim that despite the claimant's explanation on 29 September 2000, her services was terminated by the company by letter dated 20 October 2000.

It is her contention that the termination was without just cause or excuse; contrary to labour practice or act of victimisat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top