VISU SINNADURAI
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Appellant
Versus
RAVINDRAN – Respondent
Visu Sinnadurai J
The facts
On the first day of the trial, 7 September 1992, the prosecution tendered a charge against the six accused which was for murder punishable under s 302 of the Penal Code (FMS Cap 45) read together with s 34. All accused pleaded guilty and claimed trial.
In accordance with the procedure under the Criminal Procedure Code (FMS Cap 6), a jury of seven was chosen. The deputy public prosecutor after having presented a statement of facts, made a request to the court that the trial be adjourned so as to enable the prosecution to consider the possibility of the charge being amended. As there was no objection from any of the counsel acting for the accused persons, this court granted an adjournment until Wednesday 8 September 1992.
When the court sat on 8 September 1992, the learned deputy public prosecutor informed the court that the prosecution was tendering an ammended charge against the six accused. The original charge of murder was then reduced to one of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, punishable under the first limb of s 304 of the Penal Code (FMS Cap 45) read together with s 34 of the said Code. The charge read as follows:
Bahawa kamu bers
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.