PEH SWEE CHIN, WAN ADNAN GOPAL SRI RAM
JAAFAR SHAARI & SITI JAMA HASHIM – Appellant
Versus
TAN LIP ENG – Respondent
Peh Swee Chin FCJ:
This appeal involves a fatal accident to a pedestrian together with a motor cyclist; the latter did not give evidence in the trial court, who according to his counsel, was abroad at that time while there was no other living eyewitness to the accident apart from the motor cyclist. The somewhat unusual situation has given rise also to certain controversial questions which have to be decided.
The plaintiffs are the administrators of the deceased pedestrian while the first defendant was the motorcyclist and the second defendant, the registered owner of the motorcyle driven by the first defendant. The result in the Sessions Court, the trial court, was that the claims of the plaintiffs were dismissed with costs but the Sessions Court further correctly proceeded to assess damages on the assumed basis of total liability as follows in the event of an appeal:
(a) Agreed special damages RM1,500
(b) Damages for lost years RM10,635
(c) Damages for loss of expectation of life RM6,000
(d) Damages for loss of services to the children of the deceased RM5,117
(e) Damages for loss of consortium to the husband RM1,500
(f) Interest in the usual terms and costs Unspeci
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.