Abdul Malik Ishak JCA :

Introduction

[1] This is the plaintiff's application for leave to issue a writ of possession against the defendants as seen in enclosure 21. It is a sequel to the first case which has since been reported in three popular local law journals, namely:

(a) Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Berhad v. Yong Wai Hoi & Anor [2007] 5 AMR 584;

(b) Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Berhad v. Yong Wai Hoi & Anor[2007] 2 MLRH 735, [2007] 6 MLJ 709; and

(c) Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Berhad v. Yong Wai Hoi & Ors[2007] 2 MLRH 735, [2007] 6 MLJ 709 ;

[2] Enclosure 21 is worded in this way:

"LET ALL PARTIES concerned attend before the Judge/Senior Assistant Registrar in Chambers on the 1^st day of September 2006 at 9.00 a.m. on the hearing of an application of the Plaintiff named above for an Order that the Plaintiff be given leave to issue a Writ of Possession against the First and (the) Second Defendants on the Order herein dated the 23^rd day of March, 2006 pursuant to Order 45 rule 3 of the Rules of the High , 1980 and that the costs of and costs occasioned by this application be paid by the First and (the) Second Defendants. The grounds for this application are as stated in