COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
INDAH DESA SAUJANA CORPORATION SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
JAMES FOONG CHENG YUEN & ANOR – Respondent
Appeals
[1] These two appeals lodged by the appellants - plaintiffs ("the plaintiffs") arose from the orders of the Kuala Lumpur High Court made pursuant to two summonses in chambers, the particulars of which are:-
Application
Order
Encl (8)
Plaintiffs' application, to prevent the Attorney General or his officers from acting for the first respondent-defendant ("the first defendant"), was dismissed with costs.
Encl (6)
Application of the respondents-defendants ("the defendants"), to strike out the plaintiffs' statement of claim, under O 18 r 19(1)(a), (b) or (d) of the Rules of the High 1980, was allowed with costs.
(See Indah Desa Saujana Corporation Sdn Bhd & Ors v. James Foong Cheng Yuen & Anor, [2006] 1 MLJ 464 HC; [2006] 2 AMR 157)
[2] After hearing submissions, we dismissed these appeals. Our grounds now follow.
[3] For convenience, the parties herein are referred to in their respective capacities as plaintiffs and defendants in the High Court.
Factual Background
[4] On 25 October 2002, the plaintiffs, also the plaintiffs in another action ie Kuala Lumpur High Court Civil Suit No: D2-22-987-2000, had obtained default judgment for some RM14 million ("the judgment
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.