SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 MarsdenLR 836

ABDUL HAMID OMAR
KARPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SULTAN OF SELANGOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the plaintiff - In Person
For the applicant/defendant - Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman, Attorney General (Mohtar Abdullah S.L.A., with him)

JUDGMENT

Abdul Hamid Omar CJ:

His Royal Highness the Sultan of Selangor has sought to strike out the originating summons issued at the instance of Mr. Karpal Singh, the plaintiff, under O. 18 r. 19 of the Rules of the High Court 1980, and/or the inherent jurisdiction of the Court.

By his originating summons Mr. Karpal Singh seeks determination of this Court and a declaration to the effect that the public statement allegedly made by the Sultan on 26 July 1987 and reported in the New Straits Times and The star newspapers of the next day, that he would not pardon anyone who has been sentenced to the mandatory death sentence for drug trafficking in the State of Selangor, is in violation of Article 42 of the Federal Constitution (hereafter called `the Constitution') in that the Sultan can only reject a petition for clemency after considering the advice of the Selangor pardons board and then applying his mind to the petition before him.

In support, Mr. Karpal Singh relies entirely on the press reports as regards the statements attributed to the Sultan allegedly made at the opening of the general meeting of the ex-servicemen's association, Selangor branch. Photostatic copies of the press

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top