Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA PENANG
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for certiorari to quash dismissal finding. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. background facts of employment and dismissal process. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments regarding justification for dismissal. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. responses from the 2nd respondent. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. grounds for judicial review elaborated. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. employee on fixed term contract entitled to specific back wages. (Para 30 , 31 , 37) |
| 7. court's observations on dismissal processes. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 8. ratio decidendi on contractual entitlements. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 9. assessment of back wages post-dismissal. (Para 55 , 57) |
| 10. court rightly adjusted back wages based on post-dismissal earnings. (Para 56) |
[1] This is the applicant's application for certiorari to quash the whole of the 1st respondent's award in finding a case of unfair dismissal and in awarding back wages of 12 months with a reduction of 20% for post dismissal earnings to the 2nd respondent.
[2] Among the issues raised in this application was the rather novel question of whe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
