Back
Next 
2017 MarsdenLR 3174
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SUMATHY SUBRAMANIAM – Appellant
Versus
SUBRAMANIAM GUNASEGARAN & ANOR – Respondent
[Civil Appeals Nos: W-03(IM)(NCC)-56-07/2016 & W-03(IM)(NCC)-65-07/2016]
Liability in bankruptcy cases must align with judgment terms; joint debtors cannot be held jointly and severally liable without explicit contractual terms.
Headnote:The appeals concern challenges against two bankruptcy notices following a summary judgment for a loan. Under subsection 3(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1967, a debtor may contest a notice by claiming the amount owed exceeds what is due. The Court found that liability between the judgment debtors was joint, not joint and several, thus bankruptcy notices were invalid with erroneous amounts. The appeals are allowed, restoring lower court's decisions.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal concerns the legality of bankruptcy notices linked to a summary judgment. (Para 1) |
[1] These two appeals, Civil Appeal No: W-03(IM)(NCC)-56-07/2016 [1st appeal] and Civil Appeal No: W-03(IM)(NCC)-65-07/2016 [2nd appeal] were heard together just as they were similarly heard in the Court below since they arose from the same facts and involved common parties. We allowed the appeals after considering the submissions of both learned counsel. These are our reasons.
