SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2513

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SUMATHY SUBRAMANIAM – Appellant
Versus
SUBRAMANIAM GUNASEGARAN & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. the appeal concerns the legality of bankruptcy notices linked to a summary judgment. (Para 1)

[1] These two appeals, Civil Appeal No: W-03(IM)(NCC)-56-07/2016 [1st appeal] and Civil Appeal No: W-03(IM)(NCC)-65-07/2016 [2nd appeal] were heard together just as they were similarly heard in the Court below since they arose from the same facts and involved common parties. We allowed the appeals after considering the submissions of both learned counsel. These are our reasons.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top