SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 MarsdenLR 335 ; 1962 MarsdenLR 1

ADAMS
LIM KONG – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - David Marshall For the respondent - Hamzah bin Dato A. Samah (DPP)

JUDGMENT

Adams J:

This is an appeal by Lim Kong who was convicted by the learned President of the Sessions Court sitting at Johore Bahru on 9 August 1961, on an amended charge in that he between 11 and 13 February 1961, at Jemaluang in the Police District of Mersing, in the State of Johore, in order to the committing of extortion put Wong Ah Kam in fear of death of her son, Teng Wah Fook by threatening that he would kill Teng Wah Fook unless the said Wong Ah Kam paid him $14,000 ransom money, and that he thereby committed an offence punishable under s. 387 of the Penal Code. The appellant was sentenced to three years' imprisonment, and the car in which he was arrested was ordered to be confiscated.

There were eight grounds of appeal. The first of these, which was subsequently abandoned by Mr. Marshall, was in effect that there was no jurisdiction for the learned President to transfer the case from the Mersing Sessions Court to the Sessions Court sitting at Johore Bahru. In view of the fact that Mr. Marshall abandoned this it is not necessary to say anything more than that the jurisdiction of a Sessions Court is Federation wide [Courts Ordinance, 1948, s. 59(2)] and s. 104 gives a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top