HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
HO MIN HAO & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
HO YEE CHIN & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application of striking out claims due to illegality. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. overview of the legal grounds for striking out a claim. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. interpretation of trust created for illegal purposes. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. validity of trusts and property ownership. (Para 20 , 24 , 38) |
The Application
[1] This is an application by the defendants to strike out the plaintiffs' claim under limbs (a) or (b) or (d) of O 18 r 19(1) of the Rules of 2012 and/or the inherent jurisdiction of the Court. The plaintiffs' claim is for a declaration that certain properties in the 1st and 2nd defendants' names were held in trust for them. The properties were:
i. Shares in a company called Sri Magjuta Sdn Bhd ("shares") ; and
ii. A house held under HS (D) 183963 Lot PT 6817, Mukim Sungai Buloh, Daerah Petaling, Selangor ("Damansara house").
[2] The application was strenuously objected to by the plaintiffs on the grounds that the claim ought to properly be the subject of evidence and submission at the trial and cannot be resolved summarily. After these introductory remarks, it is now time to turn to the facts.
Factual Summary
[3] The undisputed affidavit evid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.