SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 2005

HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
HO MIN HAO & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
HO YEE CHIN & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application of striking out claims due to illegality. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. overview of the legal grounds for striking out a claim. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
3. interpretation of trust created for illegal purposes. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. validity of trusts and property ownership. (Para 20 , 24 , 38)
SM Komathy Suppiah JC:

The Application

[1] This is an application by the defendants to strike out the plaintiffs' claim under limbs (a) or (b) or (d) of O 18 r 19(1) of the Rules of 2012 and/or the inherent jurisdiction of the Court. The plaintiffs' claim is for a declaration that certain properties in the 1st and 2nd defendants' names were held in trust for them. The properties were:

i. Shares in a company called Sri Magjuta Sdn Bhd ("shares") ; and

ii. A house held under HS (D) 183963 Lot PT 6817, Mukim Sungai Buloh, Daerah Petaling, Selangor ("Damansara house").

[2] The application was strenuously objected to by the plaintiffs on the grounds that the claim ought to properly be the subject of evidence and submission at the trial and cannot be resolved summarily. After these introductory remarks, it is now time to turn to the facts.

Factual Summary

[3] The undisputed affidavit evid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top