FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TASJA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
GOLDEN APPROACH SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim and limitation issues (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's rationale on striking out claims (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. pleading limitation defense requirements (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 21 , 25 , 27) |
| 4. impact of winding up orders on limitations (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 26 , 28 , 33) |
Introduction
[1] This appeal involves the striking out of the plaintiff's action under O 18 r 19(1)(b), (c) and (d) of the Rules of High 1980 (RHC) on the ground that it was instituted after the limitation period stipulated by the Limitation Act 1953 (Limitation Act).
Background
[2] The pleaded case of the plaintiff is basically this. The plaintiff was engaged by the defendant to undertake certain construction works in a particular project. This appointment was in writing which we shall refer to as the "construction contract". Under this contract, a firm of engineers was appointed as the consultant. It is a term in this construction contract that the defendant would have to pay to the plaintiff within 30 days after the consultant has issued to the plaintiff an interim valuation certificate certifying the work completed and the amount due. There were
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.