SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 MarsdenLR 1519 ; 2003 MarsdenLR 1

ABDUL MALIK ISHAK
BAR MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
HF VITALITY (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD – Respondent


Advocates:
For the plaintiff - Rishwant Singh; M/s Shearn Delamore & Co

JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak J:

Facts Of The Case

The plaintiff is a well-known entity in Malaysia. It is a body corporate established under the Legal Profession Act 1976 (Act 166) (hereinafter referred to as "the Legal Profession Act 1976") and it has its address at the 10th Floor, Wisma Kraftangan, No: 9 Jalan Tun Perak 50050 Kuala Lumpur.

The defendant is an obscure private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act 1965 on 21 December 1998 and has a share capital and purportedly engaged in the business of general trading. The defendant has its registered address at No: 40-2, Tingkat 2, Jalan 14/48A, Off Jalan Sentul, Sentul Raya, 51000 Kuala Lumpur. The defendant has a business address at No: 26B, Jalan Tengku Ampuan Zabedah K, Seksyen 9, 40100 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan.

The plaintiff's statutory objects as stated under the Legal Profession Act 1976 may be itemised, inter alia, as follows:

(a) To represent, protect and assist members of the legal profession in Malaysia and to promote in any proper manner the interests of the legal profession in Malaysia;

(b) to protect and assist the public in all matters be it ancillary or incidental to the law; and

(c) to promot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top