COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TUNE TALK SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PADDA GURTAJ SINGH – Respondent
[1] This appeal arose out of the decision of the learned High Court Judge who, on 3 September 2014 dismissed the appellant's application (encl 6) to set aside the ex parte Order dated 4 March 2014 (the said ex parte Order) for the recognition and enforcement of a Final Award made in favour of the respondent in arbitration proceedings. The order for recognition and enforcement was made in accordance with s 38 of the Arbitration Act 2005 ( AA ) and under O 69 r 8(2)(b) of the Rules of 2012 (ROC).
[2] We had, after hearing submissions by counsel for both the appellant and the respondent, by a majority (Justice Nallini Pathmanathan dissenting) dismissed the appellant's appeal. Our reasons appear below.
[3] The appellant and the respondent will be referred to as they were referred to in the High Court.
[4] This appeal involves essentially a question of law, viz.
(a) Section 38 of the AA ;
(b) Section 39 of the AA ; and
(c) Order 69 r 8(2) of the Rules of 2012 (ROC).
To fully appreciate the issue at hand, it is perhaps necessary to set out a brief background of the facts leading to the present appeal. For this purpose, we adopt with some modification the brief background facts as set o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.