HIGH COURT KUALA LUMPUR
YORK (M) SALES & SERVICES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MEGA AIR CONDITIONING SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. existence and details of contractual agreements (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. nature of summary dismissal considerations (Para 4 , 5) |
[1] This an application vide a Summons in Chambers in Enclosure 9 by the Defendants/Applicants under O 18 r 19 of the Rules of the High 1980 for an order that the writ and statement of claim be struck out on the grounds that it is scandalous, frivolous or vexatious and/may prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action and/or is an abuse of the process of Court. The application is supported by Affidavit affirmed on 17 September 2009.
The Facts
[2] In the Statement of Claim the Plaintiff and the 1st Defendant entered into an agreement to sell and deliver and/or provide services to the 1st Defendant. By a Guarantee dated 13 April 2095 the 2nd Defendant agreed to guarantee the payment of the goods sold and delivered and/or services provided. The amount claimed is RM744,265.00. The Defendants in the Statement of Defence denied having knowledge of any agreement and/or guarantee and puts the Plaintiff to strict proof. The Defendants also state that if there was such an agreement the action initiated by the Plaintiff i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.