SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 2157

HIGH COURT KUALA LUMPUR
YORK (M) SALES & SERVICES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MEGA AIR CONDITIONING SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. existence and details of contractual agreements (Para 2 , 3)
2. nature of summary dismissal considerations (Para 4 , 5)
Hasnah Mohammed Hashim JC:

[1] This an application vide a Summons in Chambers in Enclosure 9 by the Defendants/Applicants under O 18 r 19 of the Rules of the High 1980 for an order that the writ and statement of claim be struck out on the grounds that it is scandalous, frivolous or vexatious and/may prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action and/or is an abuse of the process of Court. The application is supported by Affidavit affirmed on 17 September 2009.

The Facts

[2] In the Statement of Claim the Plaintiff and the 1st Defendant entered into an agreement to sell and deliver and/or provide services to the 1st Defendant. By a Guarantee dated 13 April 2095 the 2nd Defendant agreed to guarantee the payment of the goods sold and delivered and/or services provided. The amount claimed is RM744,265.00. The Defendants in the Statement of Defence denied having knowledge of any agreement and/or guarantee and puts the Plaintiff to strict proof. The Defendants also state that if there was such an agreement the action initiated by the Plaintiff i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top