COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SHARIFUDDIN MOHAMED & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
DATO ANNAS KHATIB JAAFAR & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the publication's context and reference are critical in determining defamation. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. the court examines identifiability and implications of published words. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. the outcome emphasizes the need for clear liability in terms of defamation. (Para 7 , 10 , 11) |
[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the trial judge in allowing the respondent's action against the appellants for damages for libel that was allegedly written, printed and published or caused to be written, printed and published of the respondent/plaintiff by the appellants/defendants in a national Malay language newspaper, the Harian Metro daily on the 10 April 2007. The said article appeared at p 14 of the said newspaper, entitled "Siasat Kontrak LKIM" with the sub-heading "Lembaga Pengarah lapor BPR" (impugned article). The impugned article purportedly contained the words complained of on the alleged wrongdoings of the respondent/plaintiff in his capacity as the Director General of the Malaysian Fisheries Development Authority or Lembaga Kemajuan Ikan Malaysia (LKIM), a statutory body incorporated under the LKIM Act 1972.
[2] The order in respect of liabi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.