SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 1190

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PUBLIC BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
DATUK MOHD ALI HJ ABDUL MAJID & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. claim for damages due to negligence. (Para 1 , 2)

[1] In the COURT below, the Appellant's claim against the Respondents was for damages in the sum of RM899,190.13 plus RM26,202.55 plus RM13,691.70 (see page 86 of the Appeal Record), it being the alleged damages suffered by the Appellant on account of the negligence of the Respondents, who were the partners of a firm of solicitors known as Tetuan Mohd Ali & Co, to competently prosecute its winding up petition against its customer, one ODA Holdings (M) Development Corporation Sdn. Bhd. In short, the claim was founded on the professional negligence of the Respondents.

[2] In relation to that claim, the Appellant applied for and was granted summary judgment by the learned Senior Assistant Registrar. However, on appeal by the Respondents to Judge-in-Chambers, the learned Judge ordered damages to be assessed. Against that order of assessment by the learned Judge, the Appellant bank appealed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top