SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 199

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
TEH SENG KAY – Appellant
Versus
UNITED COATINGS TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:LK Teh ,Respondent Advocate: LC Loh

Table of Content
1. dismissal details and context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. claimant's defense against dismissal. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. company's evidence and witness testimony. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. issues of dismissal versus resignation. (Para 12 , 13)

[1] This case is a reference by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 in relation to the dismissal of the Claimant by the Company from his service with the Company as Sales Manager on 12 August 2006.

[2] The Claimant was appointed as Sales Manager with the Company with effect from 1 October 2004 and was confirmed in his position on 1 April 2005. The Claimant was paid RM7,500.00 as basic salary with a fixed car allowance of RM1,000.00, sales allowance of RM500.00 and handphone allowance of RM120.00 per month.

[3] According to the Claimant's evidence, on 12 August 2006 he was called by COW-1 the Director of the Company and was questioned whether he has registered a new company. The Claimant informed COW-1 that his wife was in the process of registering a new company and COW-1 was displeased. COW-1 then took out a pre-prepared resignation letter and compelled the Claimant to resign i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top