INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
TEH SENG KAY – Appellant
Versus
UNITED COATINGS TECHNOLOGY SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal details and context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claimant's defense against dismissal. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. company's evidence and witness testimony. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. issues of dismissal versus resignation. (Para 12 , 13) |
[1] This case is a reference by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 in relation to the dismissal of the Claimant by the Company from his service with the Company as Sales Manager on 12 August 2006.
[2] The Claimant was appointed as Sales Manager with the Company with effect from 1 October 2004 and was confirmed in his position on 1 April 2005. The Claimant was paid RM7,500.00 as basic salary with a fixed car allowance of RM1,000.00, sales allowance of RM500.00 and handphone allowance of RM120.00 per month.
[3] According to the Claimant's evidence, on 12 August 2006 he was called by COW-1 the Director of the Company and was questioned whether he has registered a new company. The Claimant informed COW-1 that his wife was in the process of registering a new company and COW-1 was displeased. COW-1 then took out a pre-prepared resignation letter and compelled the Claimant to resign i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.