SCANDINAVIAN BUNKERING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD vs MISC BERHAD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Petitioner Advocates:Sitpah Selvaratnam,Siti Rahayu Mumazaini ,Respondent Advocate: YM Raja Eileen Soraya Raja Aman

Table of Content
1. judgment affirmed; limited to damages assessment. (Para 1 , 2)
2. plaintiff's claims include specific damages. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. legal basis for damages under english law. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. damages limited to losses proven by marinehub. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. key issues in damages assessment clarified. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
6. rival arguments regarding applicable law established. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
7. judicial view on law governing damages articulated. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
8. differences in law interpretation discussed. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
9. entitlement for damages asserted in judgments. (Para 37 , 38 , 39)
10. expert testimony threaded into damage claims. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)
11. discussion of available market impact on damages. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
12. comparison of malaysian and english law on damages. (Para 48 , 49 , 50)
13. malaysian law aligns with common law principles. (Para 51 , 52)
14. findings on damages measurement reiterated. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57)
15. method for establishing market price detailed. (Para 58 , 59 , 60 , 61)
16. choice of market index for damages examined. (Para 62 , 63