FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
AU KEAN HOE – Appellant
Versus
PERSATUAN PENDUDUK DVILLA EQUESTRIAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal regarding nuisance and obstruction from boom gates. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. high court findings on nuisance and obstruction. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. approval of structures is paramount to legality. (Para 15 , 21) |
| 4. inconvenience does not equate to actionable nuisance. (Para 23 , 24) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the Court of Appeal in dismissing the appellant's appeal against the decision of the High Court at Shah Alam. The High Court had dismissed the appellant's claim against the respondent for nuisance and obstruction as well as for injunction and allowing the respondent's counterclaim for damages to the boom gates and for the order restraining the appellant from harassing the committee members of the respondent and the security guards.
[2] Dissatisfied with the decision of the Court of Appeal, the appellant sought and obtained leave from this Court to appeal against the said decision on the following two questions of law:
(1) Whether the erecting of a guard house and a boom gate across a public road in a residential area amounts to an obstruction within the meaning of s 46(1)(a) of the Street, Drain
Teoh Soon Kok T/A TSK Suppliers v. Yang Dipertua Majlis Daerah Kuala Muda
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.