[1] This is an appeal against the concurrent findings of the trial court and the court of Appeal, which held that the 5th and 6th respondents were bona fide purchasers and that their title or interest in the lands hereinafter described were therefore protected by s 340(3) of the National Land Code .

[2] Leave was granted to the appellants to appeal against the order of the court of Appeal in respect of the matter decided by the trial court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, on the following three "questions of law":

"Apakah kesan Penghakiman Ingkar Kehadiran bertarikh 12 Julai 2005 yang mengenepikan serta merta Surat Kuasa Mentadbir harta pusaka si mati keatas pindahmilik tanah si mati kepada responden kelima dan keenam yang menggunakan Surat Kuasa Mentadbir tersebut;

"Apakah perlindungan yang diberi dibawah undang-undang termasuk Kanun Tanah Negara 1965 kepada harta pusaka si mati dan benefisiari sama ada dalam hakmilik Rizab Melayu dan sebaliknya;

"Sama ada pindahmilik hartanah kepada Responden Kelima dan Respondent Keenam di lindungi dibawah Kanun Tanah Negara 1965 khususnya s 340".

The aforesaid leave questions 1 and 3 could be rephrased in English as follows:

"What was th