SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 697

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TAN SRI DATO LIM GUAN TEIK – Appellant
Versus
TAN KAI HEE – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's claims and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. context of statements and evidence. (Para 4 , 26 , 27)
3. defendant's denial of statements. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's assessment of the evidence concerning the defendant's statements. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. determining whether defendant's statements were defamatory. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
6. defendant's defense assessments. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75)
7. defamatory nature of statements. (Para 36 , 37 , 38)
8. the defendant's potential defenses. (Para 43 , 44 , 55)

[1] This libel action was originally commenced by Tan Sri Dato' Lim Guan Teik ("Tan Sri Lim") and the late Tan Sri Ngan Ching Wen ("Tan Sri Ngan") as 1st and 2nd plaintiffs against the defendant, Mr Tan Kai Hee ("the defendant") on 20 November 2007. However Tan Sri Lim now proceeds with this action as the sole plaintiff as the late Tan Sri Ngan's cause of action against the defendant for tort of defamation abated purs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top