SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 2217

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
B BRAUN MELSUNGEN AG & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
TERUMO KABUSHIKI KAISHA & ANOR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Introduction

In this action, the plaintiffs are suing the defendants for infringement of Malaysian Patent No. MY-136823-A entitled "Spring Clip as Needle Tip Protection for a Safety Catheter" (the Braun Patent).

The plaintiffs' safety intravenous catheter products, "Introcan Safety", "Vasofix Safety" and "Vasoscan Safety" are claimed to practice the Braun Patent.

The allegedly infringing product is the 1st defendant's safety intravenous catheter known as "Terumo Surshield Surflo 11" (the Terumo Product).

The defendants have raised a defence of non-infringement. In addition, the defendants counterclaim to invalidate for the reason that the invention of the Braun Patent is not a patentable invention under the Patents Act 1983 (the Act) .

The safety intravenous catheter product

To make the point under discussion easier to comprehend, it is useful to have an understanding of the product in question. The product that is the subject matter of this action is a safety intravenous catheter (IVC). An IVC is a product or device that is primarily used by health care workers to administer fluids directly into a patient's vascular system. The IVC comprises, among other components, a needle wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top