SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 MarsdenLR 1297

HASHIM YEOP A SANI, HARUN HASHIM, GUNN CHIT TUAN
SRI HARTAMAS DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MBF FINANCE BHD – Respondent


Advocates:
G Sri Ram and MS Murthi (Murthi & Partners) for the appellants.
Loh Siew Cheang, Ranjit Singh and Aggie Chew (Cheang & Ariff) for the respondents.

JUDGMENTBY: GUNN CHIT TUAN SCJ(DELIVERING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT)

On 12 July 1988, MBF Finance Bhd (hereinafter referred to as the respondents) obtained judgment in the High Court at Kuala Lumpur against Sri Hartamas Development Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as the appellants) for the sum of $ 5,197,060.82 together with interest and costs. By a letter dated 24 December 1988, the respondents sent to the appellants a demand under s 218(2)(a) of the Companies Act 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), which reads as follows:

Statutory demand pursuant to s 218 of the Companies Act 1965 (Act

125) for payment of a debt

To: Sri-Hartamas Development Sdn Bhd

3rd floor

Wisma Low Kim Her

225-227 Jalan Tun Sambanthan

50470 Kuala Lumpur

Take Notice that, We, Messrs Cheang & Ariff of 18th Floor, Plaza

MBf, Jalan Ampang, 50450 Kuala Lumpur, solicitors for MBf Finance

Bhd hereby require you to pay to us the principal sum due on a

final judgment dated 12 July 1988 obtained by MBf Finance Bhd

against you in the High Court at Kuala Lumpur in Civi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top