SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 MarsdenLR 1152

INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
IREKA CONSTRUCTION BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
CHANTIRAVATHAN A/L SUBRAMANIAM JAMES – Respondent


AWARD

The dispute is over the dismissal of the claimant who was employed by the company as a lab supervisor on 30 March 1992.

The claimant was confirmed by a letter dated 27 June 1992. As from 1 July 1992 his basic salary was increased to RM2,300 with a site allowance of RM200. He was dismissed by a letter dated 21 September 1992. At the material time his last drawn basic salary was RM2,300 plus site allowance of RM300 per month.

The claimant contends that his dismissal is without any just cause or excuse and in breach of the principles of natural justice, an unfair labour practice and unlawful. He therefore prays that he be reinstated in his former job without any loss of wages, allowances, service, seniority, privileges or benefits of any kind.

In the amended statement in reply the company avers that the claimant reported for duty on 2 April 1992 and was employed specifically for the North South Expressway; Ipoh (South) to Simpang Pulai Project, due to be completed in January 1994. The company further avers that the claimant's service was terminated with just cause and excuse on grounds of poor performance and misconduct which was the frequent taking of unjustified medical leave.

Sinc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top