SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 MarsdenLR 1009

HIGH COURT MALAYA MELAKA
MOHD ALI JAAFAR – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:V Rajadevan,M Kunasegaran ,Respondent Advocate: Nasri Mohd Daud

JUDGMENT

Augustine Paul J:

[1] In this case the appellant was found guilty by the learned Sessions Court Judge at Melaka for soliciting sexual favours from one Lee Bee Yong ("the complainant"), a female, on 17 June 1995 at 12 pm. at the Immigration Office, Melaka under s 3(a)(ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1961 ("the Act") and for attempting to obtain sexual favours from her on 17 June 1995 at 8.30 pm at the Tip Top Guest House ("the guesthouse") under of the Act. He was convicted on both the charges and sentenced to three years' imprisonment in respect of the first charge and one and a half years' imprisonment in respect of the second charge. This appeal is by the appellant against the convictions and sentences imposed.

The Facts Of The Case

[2] On 7 June 1995 the complainant went to the Immigration Department at Melaka to renew her Restricted Malaysia - Singapore and International Passports. Her passport did not have the required stamp for having entered Singapore. She met the appellant who told her that not having the stamp on the passport is an offence. She asked him for help as it was her first offence and that she did not know that it was wrong. He then told her to renew

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top